Thursday, March 20, 2014

Segregation - Prejudice - Racism

When I was growing up, we only had segregation, which was good because everyone likes to live with their own, and prejudice, which was bad (at least in our house) because no one should be judged by the color of their skin or their nationality.  I wouldn't like it if someone called me a honky or a cracker, therefore, I didn't call other people names they wouldn't like.  I was about three when my mother taught me "Enny, meeny, miney mo."  It was followed by catch a colored man by the toe . . . because it was not polite to call black people niggers.  They preferred to be called colored, and we were to show respect to everyone.  

When we moved into our house in the hoioty-toity Chicago suburb, there were no colored people in town, but then there were only 14,000 people and a lot of vacant lots.  Sometime when I was in junior high, I remember one of the kids telling me there were still Jim Crow laws on the books in town.  He told me "that means black people have to be off the street by sundown."  That was stupid, and if there was such a law, no one paid any attention to it.  Of course, we rarely saw a colored person in town.

Colored people were the people who got on the el at Ridgeland.  That was the street of demarcation in Oak Park.  Colored people lived east.  White people lived west.  There was no "back of the bus" on the el that I can remember.  We were all grateful to get a seat.  The most important thing my mother taught me about colored people then was that colored women were beginning to bleach their hair.  That was not good. The texture of their hair and the bleach didn't do well together.  Their hair tended to turn orange rather than blonde, and it usually looked bad with their skin tone.  They should let their hair be the way God made it grow.  (She believed that until she went gray and began a personal love affair with Nice 'n Easy).  I remember sitting at the counter at Walgreens on State Street having a nickel coke when a colored woman with bleached hair came and sat a few stools down from us (hmmm, I just thought about that.  Walgreens. Lunch counter.  Pre-Rosa Parks.)  Anyway, my mother leaned over to me and whispered, "See what I mean about colored women bleaching their hair.  Look how funny it makes her skin look."  I looked.  She was right.

I knew about segregation.  I learned about prejudice when I was about five.  My aunt and I were waiting for the bus in Chicago and a warm spring day.  It took forever for the bus to come, and she finally had to do her magic trick of lighting a cigarette and poof, the bus would appear within a minute.  But while we were waiting, a colored mother and daughter were standing off to one side.  The daughter was a year or so younger than I, and I remember thinking she was cute but had on a hat with a wide brim that put her face in a shadow.  So I walked over to her, bent the brim of her straw hat back (and probably broke it), and said, "There.  Now everyone can see your pretty face."  

My aunt called me back to her side and told me I shouldn't have done that.  I wanted to know why.  She answered, "Because we're not supposed to mix with colored people."  That was a stupid rule.  My new friend and her mother got on the bus before my aunt and I.  They went to the back of the bus, and I followed them.  My aunt called me to come sit beside her at the front of the bus.  "But I want to sit with my friend." "You can't.  You have to stay up here."  That was another stupid rule, telling me where I had to sit on the bus.   There were a lot of stupid rules, but ones about where you could sit on a bus and who you could talk to were really, really stupid.

I don't think I had any other interaction with a colored person until I went away to college when I was seventeen.  While I was filling out the application for the dorm room, there was a question about having prejudice against colored people.  It was so dumb, I had to ask my mother what they meant.  She said they were making sure there were no problems in the dorm (whoops - pre-Rosa Parks again) by putting people with a roommate they would fight with or feelings would get hurt.  She didn't imagine there would be many colored people at school.  I asked her how I should answer the question.  She said, "Why should you care?  Somebody else has nothing to do with who you are."

Interestingly, when we moved into the dorm, the only person who had said they would have trouble with a colored roommate was the person who got the only colored girl on the floor.  I remember her telling me, "I learned a lesson today.  When I complained about being in a room with a colored, they told me it was done on purpose so so I would get over my prejudice.  They're right because she's nice."

There were a bunch of us who went everywhere together that first few weeks of school, including Marcia, our new colored friend, - until the night I learned about intra-racial prejudice.   About six of us were walking into a sock hop.  We stopped right inside the door to check out the guys (what else do eighteen year old girls do at a dance).  Marcia saw a fellow from her neighborhood she didn't know was at school.  "Ah.  I like him.  But he never looked at me at home.  Now that he knows I'm smart and at college, maybe he'll talk to me."  At that same moment the guy spotted Marcia.  His voice was so hateful.  "Hey, Marcia.  What are you doing with those white people?  What did you do, some up here and become a white lover?  Get over here."  We were all shocked.  Marcia was devastated.  She looked at him and him demanding tone.  She looked at us.  In a split second the bright, happy girl we had walked in the door with shriveled before our eyes.  "I guess I'd better go over with them."  "No," we protested.  "I have to," she said and never went anywhere with us again.  She became a recluse at first, sitting in her room studying, and then started staying out until just before curfew every night.  She had been such a happy girl.  She became so unhappy, and that one incident broke up our little group and had everyone walking on tenterhooks around each other.

I'd known what segregation was since I was a kid.  In one fleeting moment I learned what prejudice was.  I didn't like it.  

But then, later that summer, came racism.  Did things got better after Martin Luther King's March on Washington?  I've been told they did.  What I know from experience is they got very different - overnight. And racism is a far dirtier word in my vocabulary than segregation or prejudice.


Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Killing Las Vegas

Back in the good, old days - when the Mob ran Las Vegas and there was no crime (except for a few bodies in the desert of people who wanted to be criminals) - the casino owners owned everything on their property. There were no vending machines.  No cigarette machines.  No franchise restaurants.  The entire casino operation was ONE business.  No single department had to be profitable.  The entire business had to be profitable, therefore, the restaurants could offer a ninety-nine cent breakfast or a four ninety-five prime rib.  Food promotions and give-a-ways were all part of getting people through the door to make money from gambling.  At some of the casinos you could get six dollars in nickels for four dollars in cash.  Las Vegas was different from the rest of the world, and it ran more efficiently, but sometime in the mid-eighties that began to change.  

The first casino to bring in a franchise restaurant was the Riviera when they put in a Burger King.  Burger King, of course, paid rent and that company, separate from the casino, had to be profitable on its own.  With that single change Las Vegas began a downhill slide with little possibility of recovery.  Casinos are no longer businesses with a bottom line of their own.  They are miniature cities which house dozens of different business under one roof - all of which must be profitable individually.

In a meeting a few days ago regarding why live entertainment has died in Las Vegas, someone said, "Casinos are catering to the under thirty-five crowd.  They charge a hundred dollars to get in the door and three hundred dollars for a bottle of liquor and play nothing but canned music."  We all nodded our heads in agreement and went on to discuss how to overcome the situation and bring live entertainment back.

It wasn't until the meeting had broken up, and I was home in the quiet of my little office that I thought, "Wait! The casinos aren't catering to the under thirty-five crowd.  Their lessees are."  The business of casinos is no longer entertainment and gambling.  They are landlords.  Today most restaurants in casinos are franchises.  Perhaps buffets are the exception.  Entertainment is four-walled, meaning the entertainers lease the rooms to put on their own show.  Shop space is leased.  Every individual entity within the casino has to meet their own bottom line, and casinos no longer do that with gaming.  They do it by leasing space, charging exorbitant prices for rooms, and keeping their labor costs down with ticket in-ticket out slots and automated bill breakers.

Not long ago I walked through two of the mega-resorts on the Strip at eight in the morning.  There was a total of six people playing the machines and three people at the blackjack tables at one casino.  There was a total of twelve at my next stop.  If the little five thousand square foot neighborhood casino down the street from me only had that many customers at four in the morning, they would close!  But it was worse at the mega-resorts I visited that evening.  About eight o'clock the same day, when dinner should be over and the four-walled shows hadn't yet started and people should be gambling, I did another reconnaissance mission and counted a total of one hundred and twenty-five people at machines and the live gaming tables in a casino with more than a thousand machines.  The taxes on the machines alone has to be budget-breaking.  No wonder casinos can no longer afford to pay entertainers and loss leaders on food.


Friday, March 14, 2014

Live Entertainment in Las Vegas - Taxed to Death

Taxed to Death

Las Vegas is the Entertainment Capital of the World.  Huh?!  It used to be, but the Nevada Gaming/Entertainment tax has killed live music in the casinos.  In the glory days of Las Vegas there was entertainment everywhere.  Seven days a week -twenty-four hours a day there was something going on somewhere.  I remember (centuries ago) seeing Kenny Rogers and the First Edition at the lounge at the Sands. There was no one in the lounge, but they played their heart out, and everyone in the casino listened and knew they were there.  Ten years ago there were bands that played the lounge circuit.  Monday nights at the Maxim talent night filled the entire casino.  The "showroom" at the Four Queens was actually a lounge.  The Platters played there sixteen weeks a year for ten years to a full room with people standing outside four and five deep to watch.  I was a "railbird" going from casino to casino hanging over the railing (most casinos had brass railings around the lounges) to watch amazing live performers. 

About ten years ago all of that came to an end.  I missed the music, but I didn't think much about why it had happened.  I simply assumed that the casinos had become too cheap to pay the entertainers.   Then a few months ago we called a downtown casino about doing an event in their meeting room.  The answer - not if you have live entertainment.  Why?  Because of the Live Entertainment Tax.  Live Entertainment Tax? What's that.  We found another venue.  They said . . . we'd love to have you, but NO live entertainment. We won't pay the taxes.  So we started looking into it.  It turns out the "new" gaming-entertainment tax isn't new. It was put in place ten years ago - when live entertainment disappeared in the lounges.  But it didn't just disappear, it was murdered by the State of Nevada.  For Las Vegas, a city where the economy has gone to hell in a handbasket in the last decade, this may be the dumbest tax ever.  In the good old days of Las Vegas when it was the Entertainment Capital of the World, people went to a show, and an 18%  tax was added to your bill.  That was fine.  But now . . . .

The Stratosphere charges a ticket fee to take the elevator to the top of the tower.  If they have live entertainment at the top, the elevator ticket has a live entertainment tax added.  Then there is live entertainment tax added to the food and drinks and any merchandise sold.  So how do you avoid the tax? Kill the entertainment . . . and the careers of all the entertainers in town who were here when Las Vegas was the Entertainment Capital of the World.

It's not simply that the State of Nevada shot themselves in the foot when it comes to one of the major draws for its cities that sit in the middle of nowhere, they have shot entertainers in the heart!  

Why should tourists come to Las Vegas if it's nothing more than a collection of two and a half miles of tall buildings with slot machines?  You can see tall buildings in any big city in the world - most with more architectural integrity than anything in Las Vegas!  If you want to drop your money in a slot machine, there's an Indian Reservation or River Boat within driving distance of anyplace in the country.  

People who live in Las Vegas talk about the good old days when the Mob ran the town - and ran it right. The corporate mentality of "it's about the bottom line" has killed a city where you used to be able to smell the money!   The dealers all knew your name at your favorite casino.  It was exciting.  Now it's ticket in-ticket out.  Nobody knows your name - or cares to.  Change people don't exist.  Cocktail waitresses can't make a living because no one has cash.  And the president of the country has told conventions not to come to Las Vegas driving a stake through the pocketbooks of cab drivers, hairdressers and bellmen who can no long make a decent living.

Nothing can be done about ticket in-ticket out or no one carrying cash, but there is one thing that can bring back some of the excitement and glory of Las Vegas . . . LIVE entertainment.  Get rid of the idiotic tax! Bring back the music.  Do something to make Las Vegas special, because not only is it no longer the Entertainment Capital of the World, it is no longer the Gaming Capital of the World.  That title goes to Macao - a half a world away.

Sunday, January 19, 2014

The Learning Village - Las Vegas


At last something new in Las Vegas to be excited about - the Learning Village on Fremont Street, a collection of portable classrooms with a nice little wrought iron gate at the entrance.

First let me say that Las Vegas has the BEST library system anywhere. I grew up in a small town that had a fantastic library. It was in an old colonial mansion with huge white columns, a wide staircase entrance and creaky wooden floors that made you tiptoe. It sat in the middle of a lush green, city block square, park with an ice rink, a flagstone fish pond, a lapidary museum and a botanical conservatory. In Las Vegas, when people ask if I've seen the conservatory at the Bellagio at Christmas, I roll my eyes and say - so what are bunch of zinnias or chrysanthemums. In a town of 40,000 we actually did beautiful, but that's another story.

Las Vegas, despite the local mentality that says everything - including the movie theaters - has to be in a casino, has an amazing library system. While the libraries, and there are more than a dozen, may not be in the middle of a perfectly landscaped park, the buildings are architecturally interesting with theaters, an art museum at one, a children's museum at another, atriums, computer labs, meeting rooms in every size for whatever the group might be, and great staffs. There is always something going on.  However, despite the great libraries, this town, with a population of two million, has been missing a community based "learning center." We finally have one.

It's not in some old dilapidated building like Chicago or a run down, former motel like the San Fernando Valley - buildings with character even if it is on the questionable side. It's in portable classrooms, plopped on Fremont Street next to Tin Can City. - (They seriously need to do something about the exterior of that place.)

Yesterday I went to a class at the Learning Village for the first time. I assumed, by the address, that it was at Tin Can City. I wandered around and finally found someone to ask. They pointed to a collection of what appeared to be construction trailers next door. It was exciting to see that there is finally something to bring the community together, but disappointing to see that they had torn down a perfectly good, usable motel, which would have served better, in order to install shipping containers as a "mall" and trailers as the learning village. But there's no accounting for common sense. When they expanded the library in my home town, they slapped an extremely modern, glass addition onto the beautiful old colonial mansion.

But no matter how unappealing the buildings are, Las Vegas finally has the Learning Village, something I have been whining about needing for two decades. So it's common, and boring, and ugly and lacks character. At least it's here.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Truth in Music - Chapter 3

In today . . . The 9th Circuit Court has overturned the Nevada District Court ruling in Herb Reed's Manager's suit against long time concert promoter Larry Marshak's use of The Platters name. Their decision is based on a Supreme Court decision. The manager, who never had anything to do with the success of The Platters, has been trying to get rights to the trademark since Reed passed away a year ago. It's interesting, but odd, to watch the court cases continue - for more than 60 years now - after everyone involved with the structuring and success of the group has passed on with the exception of 90 year old, retired publicist/manager Jean Bennett. We'll be keeping an eye out here at the Snare to see what happens next since there are still at least two cases in court at this writing. We're still waiting for the truth in Truth in Music. So far there has been none.

Monday, December 9, 2013

Doing Downtown

There has been so much talk about what is going on in downtown Las Vegas I had to take a tour.  The Grand, where the old Lady Luck stood, is now open as is the Downtown Container Park a.k.a. Tin Can City.  There are now many bar open or opening on East Fremont.  There was little, if any, business in any of them. 

We started the tour at the Downtown Container Park.  This is a complex of shipping containers that, from the outside, put a ghetto to shame.  It is really tacky!  However, once inside, there is an very energetic parklike setting with a stage and a couple of dozen businesses in 10' x 20' containers - all that have interesting decor.  The places I stopped in weren't selling much of anything except odds and ends, but more power to the entrepreneur.  There several of bars that were rather busy, but the complex had only been open four days when we were there so they could have been curiosity seekers like us.  I was fascinated that there was a guard at the exit making sure no one took alcohol out of the park.  Most of the casinos on Fremont now have outdoor bars.  People have been walking around with drinks since I first came through town.  But what's in the Downtown Container Park stays in the Downtown Container Park.  Most curious of all were the fast food restaurants.  I can't imagine any of them staying in business for long.  Why would anyone stand in line to get a plate of ribs and beans for $14.95 when they can go down the street to Main Street Station of The Fremont for a fabulous, all you can eat buffet for less.  Time will tell.

We walked across the street to the El Cortez.  While Jackie Gaughan is still the spokesman, we've been told that the casino is under new ownership.  They haven't made many changes but they have upgraded the washrooms.  I always judge anyplace by their washrooms.  I love the ones at the El Cortez.  They have a warm feel.  The mirrors are fantastic and I would love the lighting fixtures in my living room. 

We went across the street and walked through the Medical Arts Building.  It is meant to be a hangout for the artsy crowd, but it is disgusting.  You could feel the dirt hanging in the air.  There was a little coffee bar that I believe had food.  I would not eat there. 

We moved on to the Grand.  I was looking forward to seeing it.  There has been great publicity about this new casino.  Coming up to the parking lot was a delight.  The old, huge, ugly white geodisic dome of the Lady Luck days was gone replaced by a new classy entrance.  But that's where the class ended. 

As we stepped through the doors, I looked down expecting to see some type of grand flooring.    My first thought was "I've seen this somewhere before.  It looks like it's salvage from another hotel" . . . but it was nice.  Not great but nice.  I was sure I had seen the carpeting in another casino.  It too, although it was in good shape, looked like salvage.  A casino is a casino is a casino.  They are big barns with slot machines, bars and gaming tables.  The only thing that sets one apart from another is what's on the floor and hanging from the ceiling.  What was on the floor was not impressive.  The casino was brightly lit.  There were a few people at the bar in the center of the room.  I don't remember seeing anyone playing the machines.   There was a "yuppie bar" - haven't used that word in years - down a hall at the back.  There were several people there.  We went up the escalator and I was wowed by the chandeliers.  But that is because I was wowed by them when I saw them in the convention area of the Venetian.  I don't know if these were salvaged from the Venetian or new but they are beautiful - and much to big for the low ceilings at the Grand.  The Grand reminded me of the failed remodel of the Gold Spike.  Only time will tell how it does.  It's not a place I would go back to, especially when the coffee shop steak is $31.  Come on people.  This is Las Vegas.  If I we're going to pay $31 for a steak, we want atmosphere and service not a short step up from Denny's.

It was on to the D.  I like this place more every time I go in.  The first thing the new owner did - before any remodel - was clean it.  I didn't know you could make old stuff shine and smell so good!  After cleaning, they began with a carpet change.  I love this carpet.  The Stratosphere did new carpet a couple of years ago.  I love it.  I would like a piece in my living room.  Which I like better is a toss-up between the Stratosphere and the D.  I think, when it comes to casino, the D is the winner.  But I wouldn't want it in my house.  And the new restrooms are well-done.  If you like modern, the red and black of these rooms is "cool."  There is one problem at the D - the volume of the piped in music.  The D has has a second floor, and they have done something fun.  The second floor is Vintage Vegas with old machines - coin in and coin out on some of them.  The music there is for the older crowd, but the volume is too high.  Instead of making your sit, listen and play a machine it makes you want to get up an dance.  Downstairs - heaven help them - they have chased business away with the loud, banging, distracting "music."  It's not a nightclub.  It's a casino!  I've been going to this property since the mob owned it decades ago.  I have never seen empty tables no matter the time of day or year.  However, on our tour, there were only about three people at the tables.  I realize that the rap crap is now Golden Oldies, but keep it down!  People don't even know why they're getting up and leaving, they just do.  And the bimbo Go Go girls.  Stop!  I have no problem with Go Go Girls.  I was one.  Actually I was one of the first ones, but there is a place for them, and it is not distracting gamblers.  They have expanded their showroom, but time will tell how that goes.

The Fremont is still the Fremont.  Not elegant.  Not classy.  A casino where people can go and enjoy themselves while losing their money without distraction.  And they have a good buffet. 

The Four Queens.  Same as the Fremont - except they don't have a buffet. 

The Golden Nugget - semi-upscale gambling hall.  It's THE place for entertainment downtown!

The Bayou and the Golden Goose - thank goodness they haven't changed.  'Nough said.

Then there is the Golden Gate.  If you can do it wrong, these new owners have succeeded.  The Golden Gate is the oldest property downtown, and they invented the Las Vegas Shrimp Cocktail.  There was always at least a twenty minute wait in line for the shrimp cocktail or hotdog.  That area is gone and has been replaced with slot machines no one was playing.  The tables, which were once busy 24/7, were sparse.  Again there was the loud, banging drum beat that drives people out.  And the restaurant . . . it breaks my heart.  This was my favorite place in town!  They had a great menu.  Wonderful specials.  Good food.  And elegant atmosphere.  A couple of years ago they screwed up the ceilings.  Some of that has been repaired.  But it is no longer a Las Vegas Casino restaurant.  It's DuPar's.  It I want to go to an inner city coffee shop, I don't need to come to Las Vegas.  AND, they have been closed down by the health department at least twice in recent months.  This is the restaurant I used to recommend to everyone coming to town.  Never again.

The Plaza has to be the biggest loser of all.  Once a typical casino and money maker it was beginning to become the downtown hangout when Barrack had it.  But there are new owners, and you can always tell when a casino is not doing well.  The highly taxed slot machines begin to come out and gaming tables go in to take up floor space . . . and then lounge areas are added to take up more space.  I don't know that the Plaza ever had many slot players, but the tables were always busy.  Again, like the D and Golden Gate there were no more than a half dozen people at the tables. 

It's not even worth talking about the Las Vegas Club.  Once a hangout where old time Las Vegas blackjack and craps players had been going for years it is now virtually a ghost town.  There were few players.  It was dark, dirty - but not nearly anything like the Medical Arts Building - and the Ogden Street side is completely closed. 

Binions - Can't figure out what is going on there.  The hotel is closed.  The casino had some business, but not like the days of the World Series of Poker.  It's Ogden Street side is also closed to gambling with a t-shirt shop displaying its wares in the entrance and a small, cramped Elvis Museum taking up some floor space.

The California Club caters to a clientele from Hawaii.  They always seem to be busy.  No entertainment.  A couple of bars, restaurants and fast food places.

Last and certainly not least is Main Street Station - the jewel of downtown.  I thought The Grand was going to give Main Street Station a run for it's money.  But the Grand barely compares to the older casinos.  On the other hand Main Street Station has the best food, best priced and most elegant decor of any buffet in town.  We usually hold business lunches at the Triple 7 Brewery.  The atmosphere and menu are terrific.  When it  comes to what is on the floor and ceilings of a casino, Main Street Station is the winner - not just downtown but in Las Vegas. 

So there was our tour.  The new.  The disappointing.  The odd.  The dirty and the prefectly beautiful.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Gay Marriage

Someone asked me the other day what I thought about gay marriage.  I laughed.  "Better you ask me what I think about marriage in general," I said and launched into the following lecture.

Marriage is a legal and binding contract regarding property rights.  It has nothing to do with love or sex or children.  Well, the children part is wrong.  It has everything to do with children inheriting property.  That's why, if you're not married, the kid is a bastard and isn't entitled to anything - which has created a huge market for attorneys in this post-women's lib, drop your drawers society we now live in.

If a person writes a will, he/she can leave their property to anyone they want.  They can set up whatever trust they like for whoever they want.  But if you don't have a will, marriage a.k.a. property laws prevail.      

So when you're signing on the dotted line for a marriage license, forget about love and sex and cheating and a family and happy home and all the other mushy stuff people get married for today, and think about what that contract really means which is - who gets the house and the cars and the kids and who gets to visit in the hospital and who gets to make decisions for you when you're sick.

Personally, I don't care if Fido and Bowzer get married to insure their dog houses are inherited by the right partner.  So if two guys or two gals want a legal and binding marriage contract to protect property rights, more power to them.  But, please . . . please . . . please . . . if you're a woman don't introduce me to your partner as your wife or your husband.  That's screwed up!!

Wife is a woman.  Husband is a man.  Those titles are achieved when a man and woman get married.  Fido and Bowzer, Susie and Sally, Ben and Burt have PARTNERS!  But that's my opinion, and I'm old - thank goodness - and I still believe in waiters and waitresses, chairmen and chairwomen and mailmen and mail-ladies.